""
Home of the 1969-91 Blazer/Jimmy including GM Trucks and Suburbans.  

Go Back   CK5 Forums > General Discussion > The Garage
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Supporting Members do not see these ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-03-2009, 09:36 AM   #1
jtrapani
Supporting Member
Registered User
 
jtrapani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rifle Colorado
Posts: 315

i Trader: (0 )

Frames ?'s

Did the blazers, particularly second gen, have different fames? As in 1/2 ton, 3/4 and 1 ton? If not, will a one ton work with a blazer tub? I know you'd have to chop what hangs out the back but would the cab sit properly?
jtrapani is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links



Supporting Members do not see these ads.
Old 11-03-2009, 09:45 AM
Posted in reply to jtrapani's post "Frames ?'s"
  #2
uao85
Supporting Member
Registered User
 
uao85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Edge of insanity
Posts: 1,828

i Trader: (1 )

Send a message via AIM to uao85
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtrapani View Post
Did the blazers, particularly second gen, have different fames? As in 1/2 ton, 3/4 and 1 ton? If not, will a one ton work with a blazer tub? I know you'd have to chop what hangs out the back but would the cab sit properly?
I would say that it wouldnt work, but with a torch and welder, anything is possible. If you could get a 1 ton frame hacked down to work with a blazer body, then you would have a pretty beefy frame for sure.


BTW what ever happened to your full vert blazer, I remember seeing it for sale a long time ago.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Resurrection_Joe
What's a rear naked choke?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GJK5

Just a fancy reacharound.

Quote:Jekbrown:
lol, thats the most shizzleriffic use of 'asshat' + a modifier ever.

j
__________________

__________________
uao85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 09:56 AM
Posted in reply to uao85's post starting "I would say that it wouldnt work, but..."
  #3
jtrapani
Supporting Member
Registered User
 
jtrapani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rifle Colorado
Posts: 315

i Trader: (0 )

I think you saw it when it was kurts. It's mine now. He sold it to me in december 08. Its the one in my pics. Just rebuilt the 350 to 383, got some rims and new tires. Other than that it didn't really need anything.
jtrapani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 02:37 PM
Posted in reply to jtrapani's post starting "I think you saw it when it was kurts. ..."
  #4
uao85
Supporting Member
Registered User
 
uao85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Edge of insanity
Posts: 1,828

i Trader: (1 )

Send a message via AIM to uao85
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtrapani View Post
I think you saw it when it was kurts. It's mine now. He sold it to me in december 08. Its the one in my pics. Just rebuilt the 350 to 383, got some rims and new tires. Other than that it didn't really need anything.
yeah that must have been it.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Resurrection_Joe
What's a rear naked choke?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GJK5

Just a fancy reacharound.

Quote:Jekbrown:
lol, thats the most shizzleriffic use of 'asshat' + a modifier ever.

j
__________________

__________________
uao85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 04:28 PM
Posted in reply to jtrapani's post "Frames ?'s"
  #5
dremu
Supporting Member
Registered User
 
dremu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: I came, I saw, I'm in Concord (CA, 94520)
Posts: 9,277

i Trader: (5 )

Quote:
Originally Posted by jtrapani View Post
Did the blazers, particularly second gen, have different fames? As in 1/2 ton, 3/4 and 1 ton? If not, will a one ton work with a blazer tub? I know you'd have to chop what hangs out the back but would the cab sit properly?
Well, note that Blazers only came as 1/2 ton.

Lots of folks put pickup cabs on Blazer frames -- the so-called Trazers -- but IIRC the rear cab mounts are different. Going the other way is harder, because the Blazer tub expects the rear axle hump a lot further forward than the pickemups. You'd have to chop some out of the middle, which is a bunch of work,

The other difference in frames -- beside the obvious length with single vs crew cab, etc -- is that the 1-ton frames are taller than the 3/4's and 1/2's.

-- A
__________________
74 K5: urban Smurf camo, 35"s on 52" / 56" with flip and hacking, 10b 8lug ARB/14BFF Detroit disc/disc, York OBA, Doubler, full cage, sliders, crossover/high steer, Ramsey 8000 hidden, homemade bumpers, 140A alt, half doors, no top, 4.10:1 and wanting lower.

74 C30 crewcab: Desert camo, built 468 BBC, hydroboost disc/disc stealth dually (stock WMS, tubbed wheel wells.)

Sales info, colors, options and more on my Brochures page -- now with CUCV and wiring info
dremu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 05:35 PM
Posted in reply to dremu's post starting "Well, note that Blazers only came as..."
  #6
hmatiak
Supporting Member
Registered User
 
hmatiak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 374

i Trader: (3 )

Quote:
Originally Posted by dremu View Post
Well, note that Blazers only came as 1/2 ton.

Lots of folks put pickup cabs on Blazer frames -- the so-called Trazers -- but IIRC the rear cab mounts are different. Going the other way is harder, because the Blazer tub expects the rear axle hump a lot further forward than the pickemups. You'd have to chop some out of the middle, which is a bunch of work,

The other difference in frames -- beside the obvious length with single vs crew cab, etc -- is that the 1-ton frames are taller than the 3/4's and 1/2's.

-- A

Frame material thickness differs between them too.
__________________
ROUGH CUSTOMS OFF-ROAD: ACWORTH, GA
OLD JUNK:
-'87 K10: 305TBI/700R4/208/10 bolts F&R/35's
-'84 K10: 355/SM465/208/10 bolt/12 bolt/38.5's
-'79 K20: 350/SM465/205/10 bolt w/ 4340's/14FF/40's
-'87 K20: 350MPI/SM465/208/10/14SF

NEW JUNK:

-'86 C30: 7.4/465/14FF/TOW RIG
-Trazer: 6.2/465/208/60/14FF/4.56's on 42's

hmatiak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 05:42 PM
Posted in reply to hmatiak's post starting "Frame material thickness differs..."
  #7
jtrapani
Supporting Member
Registered User
 
jtrapani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rifle Colorado
Posts: 315

i Trader: (0 )

I was thinking it would be thicker. Which would be the point. To have a stronger frame. Sounds like too much work when boxing might give the strength needed.
jtrapani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 06:01 PM
Posted in reply to jtrapani's post starting "I was thinking it would be thicker. ..."
  #8
hmatiak
Supporting Member
Registered User
 
hmatiak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 374

i Trader: (3 )

Quote:
Originally Posted by jtrapani View Post
I was thinking it would be thicker. Which would be the point. To have a stronger frame. Sounds like too much work when boxing might give the strength needed.

All depends on the purpose. I did the blazer then trazer. Now im buliding a one ton frame to put all my running gear under.
__________________
ROUGH CUSTOMS OFF-ROAD: ACWORTH, GA
OLD JUNK:
-'87 K10: 305TBI/700R4/208/10 bolts F&R/35's
-'84 K10: 355/SM465/208/10 bolt/12 bolt/38.5's
-'79 K20: 350/SM465/205/10 bolt w/ 4340's/14FF/40's
-'87 K20: 350MPI/SM465/208/10/14SF

NEW JUNK:

-'86 C30: 7.4/465/14FF/TOW RIG
-Trazer: 6.2/465/208/60/14FF/4.56's on 42's

hmatiak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 06:23 PM
Posted in reply to hmatiak's post starting "All depends on the purpose. I did the..."
  #9
mtnman
Supporting Member
Read my signature!
 
mtnman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Parks AZ
Posts: 880

i Trader: (0 )

http://coloradok5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=235499
__________________

http://www.usflag.org/uscode36.html#176 -

I swear to protect and defend the Constitution of The United States, from all enemies, foreign and domestic, so help me God.

MOLON LABE
To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men.
Lincoln, Abraham

Time to party like its 1776!


I am NOT perfect.... But, I am FORGIVEN!
mtnman is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply
Sponsored Links



Supporting Members do not see these ads.


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.