K5 Blazer Forums  
Home of the 1969-91 K5 Blazer/Jimmy including GM Trucks and Suburbans.  
Go Back   CK5 Forums > General Discussion > The Garage

Remove these ads.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-17-2006, 08:16 PM   #1
1-ton
Registered User
 
1-ton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 2,397

i Trader: (0 )

Spread Bore to Square Bore Carburetor Adapter Plate modifications?

I am getting ready to install a new Edelbrock Performer 750 CFM (electric choke) carburetor on my 1985 K30 Dually with a 454. Since I am using the stock cast iron intake manifold, with a spread-bore bolt pattern for a Q-jet, I am using a spread bore-to-square bore adapter plate, in order to install the Edelbrock Performer carburetor, which has a square-bore bolt pattern.

My question is that when I test fitted the adapter plate to the carburetor, the adapter plate plenum partially blocks both the primary and secondary carburetor venturie pathways. I was thinking of getting my die grinder out, and grind back the adapter plenum area to match the carburetor venturie pathways better. Has anybody done this modification before, and have any advice on it, or would it be a waste of time because this engine is only a stock engine anyway?
1-ton is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links



Remove these ads.
Old 05-17-2006, 08:50 PM   #2
beater_k20
Banned
 
beater_k20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 10,281

i Trader: (0 )

improved airflow is NEVER a waste of time.
beater_k20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2006, 09:25 PM
Posted in reply to beater_k20's post starting "improved airflow is NEVER a waste of..."
  #3
diesel4me
Supporting Member
Registered User
 
diesel4me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Massachussetts
Posts: 13,502

i Trader: (0 )

Lightbulb what brand...?

What brand of adapter are you using??..all the ones I've used like "Trans-Dapt" and "Proform" ones already have the spacer milled out to match the Q-jets shape and is just square on the carb side,and though they come close,they dont block off the flow of either set of barrels..but then I've only used 600 CFM carbs,maybe the 750 CFM is different??..(larger butterflies/venturies?)..

One thing I often see is the adapter installed with the wrong side facing the carb!..I bought a good truck cheap once thinking it needed a motor or engine work,and all along it was a vacuum leak from the owner installing the adapter wrong side up!...also many aftermarket manifolds need a flat plate to seal the base of a square bore to them properly..

They make several styles of adapters for square bore to Q-jet manifolds..some have 4 separate holes,and are claimed to increase low end torque..others are open,or have a divider separating the primary and secondary barrels..I tried both on an AFB on my SB 400,and the 4 holer seemed to reduce power in my estimation!..the one with the divider ran MUCH stronger..but every engine is different..I think the slightly taller height of the one with the divider is what made the difference mostly,not the divider..the one with the open center was about the same ...
__________________
82 K2500 GMC stepside 6.2 diesel,
TH-400,NP-208,14 bolt SF/corp.10bolt,7.5' fisher plow- --rusting away fast though.

81 G10 van 73 307 V8 th350/MV4 2.73 10 bolt..

95 FORD Countour!..my first ford ever,after 30 years of driving! --a gift from the queen of bluegrass Rhonda Vincent!
THANKS RHONDA!
(SOLD IT ..11/30/13..)

Latest addition--1985 K-10 Suburban,6.2 diesel,700R4,3.73's,12 bolt rear..still awaiting repairs and to be registered..
diesel4me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2006, 11:30 PM   #4
1-ton
Registered User
 
1-ton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 2,397

i Trader: (0 )

Quote:
What brand of adapter are you using??..
It is a very cheap Summit Racing brand made in Taiwan ($13), which may be why the fit is not exactly perfect. The spread bore side, which goes to the intake manifold, sizes up just fine, but the square bore side, which goes to the carburetor is the one that is off by about .020 of an inch.

1-ton is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.